Friday, September 11, 2009

北京(五):捕風‧捉影

童年的風景/嚴培明


“甚麼?你…說…甚麼?我…我聽…不到!”

蒲掀開膠簾,叫人駐足的不是畫作,而是有如置身直昇機底的強勁風聲和氣流。

我和友人相對著豎起大拇指,以身體僅有的語言表達對這件作品的讚嘆,沒錯,這個以畫布出身的藝術家叫你先別用眼睛看,而是以聽覺和觸覺去感受這趟旅程,也請你尊重那一幀幀隨風搖曳的孩童肖像,他們不是國家元首、民族英雄或宗教領袖,但都帶著一份沉甸甸的肅穆,莊嚴地佇立在跑道一樣寬大的空間裡。

“我的作品很大,是為了讓觀眾有進到我的世界裡的感覺。”的確,這裡大得讓我們都忘了它是UCCA內的一部份。嚴培明的首個裝置展,把畫作退到了配角的位置去,想要捕捉肖像的臉容比捕風更難,或許飽歷創傷的臉就是容易被扭曲、遺忘。

還沒看這件裝置前,我構想的童年風景都色彩斑斕。來自不一樣的國度,不一樣的種族,帶著不一樣的故事,相同的是小孩兒生命中應有的色彩和笑容都給剝奪了。人們都說小孩渴望長大,但當他們長大以後又渴想返回童年,那只是假設童年都美麗如詩,若然大家的童年都像這裡的小孩一樣顛沛,任誰都不願回頭。

予其說是“風景”,倒不如說像個“墓園”,更為貼切。“紀念碑意味着久遠和宏大,中國的宣傳畫為了宣揚和造就政治意義上的紀念碑,很有震撼力。”嚴氏一直堅持自己畫的都是真實的人,以記錄歷史、見證歷史,這些小孩又見證了一個怎樣的歷史?世界大同下,他們又即將迎向一個怎樣的未來?

Thursday, September 10, 2009

北京(四):川流不息 - 解構中國


正當奧運的餘震還在運動的時候,藝術家們已紛紛就當下的社會問題進行研究和探討。來自四個國家七個地區的藝術家用影像揭示我國的種種現象,不都為人垢病,但絕對值得關注:

消逝中的老北京、老上海;
連綿不斷的爛尾樓;
追求自主的新世代;
漸漸在他邦長大的中國養女;
全球化下的民工;
……

一切都沖積着歲月的演練與變奏,千絲萬縷,渴想一夜光明似是遙不可及的事,但難得在首都看到一個這樣誠實的展覽,進步不少了…

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

北京(三):建造/拆毀/再建造 ─ 迎向靈光消逝的北京

筆者攝

賈樟柯_城市再生


無論走多遠的路,朋友到北京,非要一睹中央電視台的真貌不成;轉個頭,看見賈樟柯360度一take過拍下的建築工地,又是這條“褲”;看來這個標誌性建築物為首都帶來了不少震盪。

二十世紀德國文化評論家本雅明(Walter Benjamin)曾對在機械複製時代的藝術品提出過“靈光”衰退的概念;一件藝術品的真跡之所以比複製品珍貴,在於其“此時此地”── 獨一無二地存在於其所在之處,見證時間和歷史的考驗,是為其權威所在。複製技術使本來獨一無二的珍品脫離了傳統的領域,“僅此一回”的經驗因此被沖刷、動搖,同時原作之真實性更受到前所未有的質疑和試探。究其原因,離不開對珍品的渴求及崇拜,希望盡可能把它拉近自己,甚至完全的擁有。

“這些方塊一點特色都沒有!”剛抵步時那位的士司機毫不留情地批評沿途的都市化建築。不錯,它們都很相像。

在迎向奧運之際,當北京的真貌必須披露人前的時候,我國元首所珍視的並非自身國度所散發的獨有靈光,而是他國的靈光,一些隨時可被複製的設計及一個所謂國際大都會的基本藍圖。人們到北京一睹的,不是北京的靈光,而是某某建築大師的靈光,這種靈光可以隨時出現於紐約、倫敦、巴黎,不再受時間及地域所限。在把別國的珍品複製到我國的同時,我們正不斷地破壞自家發源的靈光,逐漸向傳統道別。

最後只剩下影像,讓歷史的“靈光”永遠安息。

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

北京(二):藝術家明星化

周松 - 化蝶 I
290 cm x 300 cm,2007-2008

在今日美術館踫上了周松的首個個人展覽,沒被那栩栩如生的內臟肺腑給嚇怕,倒因年紀輕輕才廿七歲的他已能開辦屬於自己的作品展,覺得不可思議,不是我瞧不起年青藝術家,只是訝異作為館長的竟願意這樣大力提拔後輩,一點不怕影響博物館的形象,也佩服周松能在短時間內完成這麼多高質量的作品,聽說上面這幅蝴蝶便花了他整整一年的時間。

“在國內的確少有…”連周松也承認自己是幸福兒。他坦承現場展出的所有作品都不屬於他,而是自他從天津美術學院畢業後便一直資助他作畫生涯的一家藝廊所持有,為他一手包辦租借工作室、佈展、宣傳到作品銷售,他就像後起之秀給公司簽了賣身契,一定年日內必須作畫有成;但若然嘔不出傑作來又如何?這樣敏感的話題當然點到即止,對於初出茅廬的他,能得此機會夫復何求?

看得出來他仍在摸索屬於自己的風格,早期作品追求的是畫工的細膩寫實,概念薄弱,單一地結合了美與醜、善與惡,血肉橫流的機關槍跟魚頭組合而成的玉蝶,都在突顯畫家的巧奪天工,要想做到超現實主義的哲學味似乎力有不逮,當被問到為何結合魚屍和蝴蝶時,他也一臉胡疑,只道魚頭的形態跟蝴蝶身上的花紋好不搭配,為要製造遠觀時的錯視效果(讓人誤以為蝴蝶是真的,及至近看時方知是魚頭),魚眼才被選上;我倒覺得兩者結合後有動物死後化蝶的韻味,穩含從“形而下”超脫至“形而上”的過程。

後來的作品加入了中國水墨畫的元素,無疑想樹立別具東方味的風格,須知把血肉畫得出神在國外早有奇才,要吸引外國買家,不得不借助中國熱,可周氏似乎把國畫中所強調的“留白”變成了一種單純的空間佈置,而非“意境”,含混了西方的極簡派藝術風格。水墨畫中本來有水的地方被空白取代,是此處無物勝有物,企圖凝造出“本有”的想像空間,跟“less is more”的返璞歸真不一樣,從多餘的元素中去蕪存菁周氏做到了,但論到意境,相信還需時琢磨。

Monday, September 7, 2009

北京(一):藝園遊


第一次走訪祖國首都,沒看長城紫禁城,卻參觀了多個千禧後紅得很的藝術園。

當“老大”的798因知名度高,規劃得特別好,不但交通便利,現場地圖、路標、餐室、精品店一應俱全,絕對是買家遊客至上,諾大的空間盡是修飾整齊的藝術品,像極了商品,卻一點不像工作室;曾聽一內地學者分享,當年的798是真的很有“ART味”,製作材料七零八落,到處都是塗鴉和沒完成的雕塑,是年青藝術家的天堂。後來這裡出了名,引來了國內外的傳媒追訪,中央才成立了一個甚麼建設管理辦公室,把區內設施整頓一番,方便了參觀者,卻失去了原來的實驗精神。現在的798是藝術品銷售的最佳展場,是你消磨一個週日下午的理想好去處,想與藝術家近距離接觸,可能要跑到公交車都不開的宋庄去,岳敏君和一眾藝術家不是都擠到了那裡遠避繁囂?

離798不遠處同樣以舊廠房改建而成的酒廠國際藝術園可沒那麼走運,畫廊外殼還算可以,就是裡頭的作品太少,又因交通不便,訪客極少,為了節省開支,畫廊都習慣在沒觀眾的時候關燈,初時還以為他們都在當天休館(中國人這個“美德”不正是距人千里的另一表徵?)。我們逐家推門踫踫運氣,可唯一接待我們的只有Osage,聽說他們也正準備遷回798,負責人說自金融海潚後只有798或一些外資的國際畫廊存活下來,其餘的不是荒廢了便是搬到更便捷的地區去。另一個草場地藝術區的境況更慘淡,多個畫廊還在施工,處處泥濘,能圍繞全場走上一圈已算難得,但相信過不多時這裡定會重拾熱鬧。

比這三個藝術區更商業的是新開發不久的二十二院街藝術區,商廈之內附設展覽場,多間藝廊經紀除租用辦工室外更為自家發掘的青年藝術家包辦個人展覽及作品營銷,製作精美的作品集長派長有,質量叫人驚喜,參觀當日就踫上了兩個不到三十的藝術家的個展,有幸跟其中一人對談,明日繼續…

Monday, June 1, 2009

Annual Show 2009


這個應該是離開前辦的最後一個展覽,不是最辛苦的卻是收穫最豐的,規模較前兩次的都大,要應付的單位也特別多,幸好上頭給了100分,不滿的聲音自然石沈大海,爭論最激烈的要算陳列系統,全程 “妹仔大過主人婆”,畢業生的作品淹沒其中,反成了陪襯品;最開心的應該是一眾Year 1 的學生,自家製的設計有幸能派上用場,那種喜悅只有當學生的才會明白。

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

當代荷蘭交流設計 - 深圳華.美術館


繼去年底香港的“設計營商周”找來了荷蘭為合作伙伴後,荷蘭設計繼續進軍內陸市場,單一的平面設計展能用上整個博物館作展示,規模之大香港實難比擬,再看展品的多元性,我這個香港設計人也不得不對國內提供的藝展平台嘖嘖稱羨,但同胞們可有把握機會“偷師”則無從得知,現場所見人迹罕至,看來他們都不認為外國的月亮特別圓。

聽國內一唸設計的小弟說道,最少學生選修的便是平面設計,因其專業性不高,容易被取代,再加上薪酬及前景遠不及產品或室內設計,自然沒多少人投資這一門專業,就連跟平面設計分屬兄弟的學科如電腦動畫及網頁設計也都遇上“畢業等於失業”的困境,年青一輩唯有敬而遠之,更別說花時間看設計展。莫怪乎書店裡順手沾來的都是褒揚中國現代建築的書籍,要找當前中國平面設計師的總集,首推由呂敬人設計的“書戲”,我可是在台灣“誠品”找到了,深圳及香港連一點影兒也沒有,看來中國平面設計的展示空間還有待擴展,這個創立印刷術的文明古國,應該懂得珍視活現於紙上的藝術吧?

Thursday, February 19, 2009

TBS DigiCon6 Video Festival 2008

哪裡傳來了這兩套動畫,充滿驚喜;記得設計學院的學生都想做一套本土味 + 人情味十足的動畫,一來是分數的保證,二來是從眾多畢業生中突圍而出的捷徑,可惜綜觀歷屆作品,為人青睞者並不多:蘇敏怡、鍾偉權、淡水...屈指可算,要道理說得顯淺易明又不落俗套,我想這兩個故事做到了。

二等獎: "我阿媽係外星人"


一等獎: "動畫鏗鏘集-隱蔽老人"


Sunday, December 21, 2008

Tangible Traces: Dutch Architecture & Design in the making


這場展覽辦得真趕,不但時間短,經費缺,所有籌備工作基本上都由香港這邊一手包辦,還真沒聽聞過設計師會突然消失,好佩服老闆的臨場應變,最終還是搞得有聲有色,我都以為即食文化為香港獨有,原來歐洲也不賴。第一次到這個由工業中心改建而成的藝術中心,感覺不錯,只是每層的樓底太矮,氣勢遠不及國產798或1933,都怪香港空間少,但不也是我們的獨有特色乎?綜觀現場閃光燈的頻率,好評如潮耶!

Saturday, November 29, 2008

An Evening with Nick Vujicic


Well for sure it's been a much anticipated event of the month. His story has been around for few years already and i finally got the chance to meet him outside YouTube. What a loss that we couldn't hug him one by one as scheduled. His Hong Kong tour was just a bit too packed. Guess the organizer was making full use of the cost they spent on the event. But judging from Nick's sunshine smile all along, I think he felt complete in this trip. He definitely would not forget this brilliant translator of the night who even made sense of his every single body language which in turn added extra colours to such a formulated seminar. Just not to mention how many times tears had welled up in my eyes, Nick's speech was gorgeous. I've listened to the same content at least more than once online, but the live impact was not at all diminished. He's a true miracle and he creates miracles in others' life. Wish him all the best on the Mainland tour!

Sunday, November 23, 2008

a book to share, a thousand look to bear...

努力了一年的書快將面世,心情有點複雜,兼任設計與助理編輯,更可於PageOne出售,該是樂極了的喜事,可我卻擔心其質量叫人失望。設計過程本來就千奇百怪,有人因一個突如其來的靈感一夜成名,有人十年寒窗為人類帶來無盡的福祉,更有人只為挑起你的物慾而不斷設計廢物... 諷刺地這本探討設計過程的書卻用上了同一個框架來處理六個不同的案例,加上單一的排版,把設計者的個性完全淹沒,造就了一本工具書,卻成不了一本兩者兼備的設計書,可惜。

再談設計一本書時功能上的考慮。近日因工作原故要翻印大量的藝術雙年展年刊,發現不同地方的設計師在構思這樣一本書籍時,往往忽略了我們這一類用家(研究員)。北京上海廣州把年刊的結構規格成有如《論語》一樣的典藏,笨拙得來嚴肅,翻閱時非常不便;新加坡與台灣就把年刊當商業書來設計,俗得很;最恰如其分的要算日本,不單在內容及排版上落足心思來突顯當年的展覽主題,紙質和尺寸亦恰如其分,極方便查閱及翻印;果然,日本的設計特別細心。

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Shanghai Biennale 2008 - Int'l Student Exhibition


這趟到上海辦展覽,看到國內同胞不一樣的面貌。除了愈見豐裕的生活質素外,還有那好客之道,是以往自由行時難得一遇的,大城市所具備的內涵,似乎漸漸地從她身上散發出來,老實說,我較上一次更愛上海。

友人紛說這是上海人的野心,「禮」是裝出來的。本就勢利的香港人不好說話,難道我們還嫌自己的面具造得不夠肖妙?人家才只不過是大專生,想得單純一點吧!我倒覺得他們有自信、願意交流,一點不怕給外人批評,渴想進步的動力遠超本土學生;這也難怪,國內的大城市本來就由不同省市的人才匯聚而成,兼容性之高難以比擬,自認多元的香港人多久了還容不下自己的同胞,更莫說其他小數族類在港的辛酸故事。也許,吃不到的葡萄總是酸的?

Monday, August 25, 2008

Impossibility in memory forgetting: Atonement (Part II)


The thin borderline between fantasy and memory was heightened with Briony constantly revisiting her childhood memory, consciously in the form of a letter asking for forgiveness from her sister and a novel draft based on the event she saw by the fountain; unconsciously in the form of day-to-day conversation with other nurses, from which we grasped bit by bit Briony's real feeling towards Robbie, and hence disclosing the part of memory she had screened off and repressed over the years. Lots of mirror shots were used throughout the film to associate the kind of vanity in story telling by exposing the ego in each of the character, if we recall Lacan's mirror stage of "I". Briony has constantly been splitting among her outer self and inner ego. Is not it the same for memory? How could we tell the truthfulness of our memory? Are they only fantasies or more accurately dreams?

In the first part of the story, we might well be thinking that Briony experienced tremendous shock from what she saw happening between Robbie and her sister Cecilia by the fountain. She immediately expressed her shock through the narrative of her play, in which she rhetorically paralleled Robbie to the character of her story and described him as "the most dangerous man in the world", which led to her preconceived "mistake" in accusing Robbie for the molestation after the second shock in the library. Fantasy and memory again intertwined within little Briony's mind. It was through memory that Briony's fantasy got nourished, while from the other way round, it was through fantasy that Briony's memory got revived and relived. As Deleuze described, "writing is a question of becoming, always incomplete, always in the midst of being formed, and goes beyond the matter of any livable or lived experience." (1) Briony's writing (fantasy) was constantly refining and redefining her personal experience that lived through memory. It was never formed in a chronological and ontological way.

It was not until the flashback of Robbie saving Briony by the river bank were we able to know the true feeling of little Briony. She has been repressing her love towards Robbie whom she regarded as a "crush" when she was 18. By then, it would make full sense to interpret the accusation as repulsion out of jealousy. That "mistake" made in remembering the assault was to a certain extent quasi-deliberative. As Briony watched the incident, we were immediately flashbacked to the actual scene from the perspective of this "two figures by the fountain", learning the true story behind. With a smooth transition from the previous to the present scene, this part of flashback worked as a holistic structure of the story rather than a distinctive intervention. One might realize that it was a flashback very lately if he or she missed a second of attention to the details. It not only brought us back to the past just a moment ago, but at the same time challenged our conventional way of looking at past events. Was it really past or simply living along with our ongoing memory? When we perceived it as something that followed, it might turn out to have happened before. "Memory is of the past" as historians put it but here we could see the linear temporality of memory being broken down and challenged by cinematic approaches.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Impossibility in memory forgetting: Atonement (Part I)


According to Freud in the Uncanny, the notion of screen memory was defined as one that "owes its value as a memory not to its intrinsic content, but to the relation obtaining between this content and some other, which has been suppressed." (19) When impression of a particular experience is retained in our memory, the content of such an experience may have no meaning to us, yet the content related to it which has been absent so far may be important to us. There are basically two psychical forces involved in producing these memories–one as wanting that experience to be remembered while the other resisting this choice. In this film we shall see how a novelist has been struggling with her memory of the past because of guilt and trying to resist her own forgetfulness of these memories due to physical abnormity conquering her dying body.

The whole story was basically structured into four main parts:
I) England 1935 – The Tallis House
II) North Western France. Four years later – The Retreat of Dunkirk
III) London. Three weeks earlier – The Hospital of London
IV) An interview of truth

Due to the disclosure of part IV, I am tempted to interpret the first three parts of the story as the mind–memory and creation–of the novelist, Briony Tallis and throughout the film sufficient hints were suggested for audiences to associate to such allegory. As Ian McEwan reminded us in the Making-of Atonement, "what you must never lose touch of, is that this is all being reinvented for us by Briony." The opening frames kicked off with "a kind of dynamism in the camera" which showed us the creative energy and confidence of a 13-year-old bourgeois Briony who had been the subject dragging the camera around the big Tallis House. It should be noted that from then on, a particular background music composed of typewriter clacking sound appeared throughout the story, which not only on one hand expressed the unanimous creativity of little Briony, but on the other hand also suggesting consciously to us that we were indeed going through the creation process of 77-year-old Briony's novel, which had in a sense rendered it impossible to differentiate the truthful part of the memory–things that did happen–and the fantasy part–things that did not happen at all. Was the memory working as part of the plot she created for her new novel? The clacking typewriting sound served as an obvious medium to connect this narrative time of the past with the present reality of the novelist who had been doing her best to record what she did and amend what she did not. The truth was unveiled at the last part of the film in form of an interview that largely enhanced the authenticity of the film by suggesting a sense of present established through first person interaction with the character. As Wright mentioned in the Making-of, "the cinematic equivalent of first person is interview. This is as close as one gets to talking directly to an audience, to remove the veil of fiction."

The intertwining or inseparability of memory and fantasy has been discussed further by Freud in his another essay called The Creative Writer and Daydreaming, from which he tried to associate a writer's creativity with his or her childhood memory. When children enter adolescent, they will cease playing to give up the link with real objects and turn their mind to fantasies, or daydreams. How these fantasies are formed relates so much to the one's memory of the past. (28, Uncanny) If this were the case, the first part of the movie, which focused on the childhood of Briony, has been the crucial source for drafting her fantasies over the other parts of the film. The most obvious content was the one in hospital where nurse Tallis were ordered to comfort a dying French soldier. Based on the story from this hallucinated soldier, Briony responded with her own memory of the past–something about the story between Cecilia and Robbie–intertwining with her current fantasies with this soldier that pointed towards their future marriage. This present experience–encounter with the soldier–has evoked Briony's recollection of childhood memory from which she always desired the love of Robbie but unsuccessful, and so she tried to fantasize a future marriage as an implicated way to fulfill such desire.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

DON'T YOU FORGET?


友人的畢業習作,覺得很有意思。

他把廢紙再造並聚疊起來,形成了有如木一樣堅硬的質料,然後將其裁成字母,組成"DON'T YOU FORGET?"的凸版印刷,在懷緬已逝的工藝技術之餘,教人思考現代科技所銷毀的生活質感:一樣的字體、一樣的內容、一樣的產品...我們還會記得那份由人手所造而帶來的驚喜與悸動嗎?

記得有日哥從家附近的市場買來兩個久違了的“菠羅包”,不亦樂乎,我還以為是價廉的原故...“你在美心買不到這麼新鮮的,而且每個都不一樣!”令他開懷的原來是那份漸漸被埋沒的人情味,是多少句“謝謝光臨”都比不上的。透過友人親手的製作,作品被賦予感情,獨一無二之餘,更力證時間的考驗,而值得深思的,是整個資本主義社會的麻木不仁。

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

"a woman's whole life in a single day..."

許久沒看過這樣悲的電影,赤祼祼地彰顯了人在面對生命中各種起跌更迭時的無能為力。一本看來平凡不過的小說把三個女人的生命連結在一起,探討的是人與生俱來最根本的問題 — 生命為何?

當付上了一生所愛的人認為你的犧牲微不足道;當註定要跟一個永遠活在自己過去的人共渡餘生;當你再無法與眼前的這個世界溝通時…你,會如何自處?大抵我們都覺得Laura太狠心,也無從理解一個全然活在自己創作世界裡的人的痛苦,但我們或多或少也曾經質疑過自己所做的事情有何意義,這可是花一輩子也想不通的問題,天生的惰性會叫我們把問題擱置一旁,但當其猛然來襲時,卻足以動搖我們生的念頭。

三位女主角分別作了她們的決定,只有一人選擇把生命結束,可說是這部電影至為積極的一環,畢竟我們對生命仍有期盼。很喜歡電影中的氣氛,那一天、那一刻,似是即將來臨,卻又凝結了,並且無限擴張…"a woman's whole life in a single day -- just one day -- and in that day, her whole life." 三個女人的一天,教你思考你的一生。

Thursday, July 3, 2008

旁觀者 II

a piece of sharing in Newsweek which talks about how a youngster looks at his American identity in this "post-Americanism" world. It is not as egoistic as we used to think. And his fleshy cultural experience in Asia could not be more intriguing...

"I've been backpacking through India for the past six months, and one of the most fascinating parts of my travels has been the responses I get when I say I am from America. In villages and smaller towns, people react with either awe or anger. Whether positive or negative, the response is usually so passionate that it is sometimes difficult to answer the barrage of questions about anything from Britney Spears to George W. Bush to Las Vegas. However, when I travel to places like Delhi, Mumbai and Singapore, the response is much different. The jet-setting, speak-five-languages, work-hard, party-hard crowds in these Asian cities are unlike any group of people I've ever met. They're more elegant than the Upper East Side, hipper than Williamsburg and faster than Chelsea. While Americans are disdained for being imperialist consumers in the villages, Americans are simply behind the times in the fancy enclaves of cities. Anti-Americanism is difficult to handle, but apathy toward America might be even more unsettling. As a child of the 1980s, I've never known America to be anything but an unmatched superpower. It's particularly strange to be in the part of the world that is considered the next frontier. Maybe this is why Americans don't travel as much as others around the globe. It's not easy finding out you're not at the center of the universe anymore. That said, it's amazing to be traveling at this moment in history; being out here has given me a humbled perspective to bring home. In the end, that's not such a bad thing."

- Sara Weston at New Delhi, India (Newsweek, Jul 7/ Jul 14, 2008)